The Neglect of the Elderly

Elderly neglect is an overlooked problem in the society (McAlpine, 2008).When people get old, they may not think, see and hear as they used to. These weaknesses create room for immoral people to exploit them.Advertising We will write a custom essay sample on The Neglect of the Elderly specifically for you for only $16.05 $11/page Learn More Therefore, elderly abuse by family members and other caregivers exists in frequencies and rates slightly lower than child abuse (Quinn and Tomita, 1997). This makes it one of the most common forms of domestic abuse. Although governments and other agencies have taken great strides toward ending this ungodly act, more should be done to eradicate or lower cases involved. According to McAlpine (2008), spotting victims and providing timely interventions are some of the measures aimed at curbing elderly neglect. Additionally, there should be mandatory training and recognition of caregivers and professionals working in this area (McAlpine, 2008). Stiffer penalties should also be imposed on caregivers who fail to meet their obligations. This essay gives an insight into the neglect of the elderly. Latest statistics show that tens of thousands of elderly people face abuse by people trusted with their care (Helpguide.org, n.d.). Helpguide.org (n.d.) also reaffirms that more than half a million cases of elderly abuse reach the authorities yearly in the USA alone. Surprisingly, millions of other cases go unreported. Elderly neglect makes up more than half of these cases (Helpguide.org, n.d.). In this context, elderly neglect is the failure of caregivers to discharge their responsibility appropriately (helpguide.com, n.d.). This can be from the failure to provide the elderly with basic needs such as food, clothing and shelter. In most cases, the affected elders are distressed. For that reason, psychological disturbances are the main symptoms of elderly neglect.Advertising Looking for essay on aging? Let' s see if we can help you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Learn More International agencies and governments have devised a number of initiatives to curb and create awareness on elderly neglect. For instance, there is a world elderly abuse awareness day celebrated annually. Therefore, it is true that majority of elderly people are not completely neglected. However, more effort should be directed towards the few caregivers who still practice the vice. This can be done by a number of ways. Firstly, victims should be spotted early enough and timely interventions provided (McAlpine, 2008). Secondly, mandatory training should be given to caregivers and professionals working in this area (McAlpine, 2008). Thirdly, caregivers and other people working with the elderly should be given proper recognition to boost their morale. Lastly, stiffer penalties must be imposed to deter people from abusing and neglecting these fragile people (McAlpine, 2008). In conclusion, it is agreeable th at people take no notice of elderly neglect in most cases. However, elderly neglect is a serious and deeply rooted issue in our society. Additionally, only child abuse occurs in rates and frequencies higher than elderly neglect (Quinn and Tomita, 1997). This makes it one of the most recurrent forms of domestic abuse. Furthermore, governments and other agencies have taken bold steps towards ending this shameful act. Nonetheless, more should be done to minimize cases involved. Spotting victims and providing timely interventions are some of the ways of restraining elderly neglect (McAlpine, 2008). McAlpine (2008) also adds that mandatory training and recognition of caregivers and professionals working with the elderly can alleviate the vice too. Giving offenders stiffer penalties can also deter people from abusing the elderly. Eventually, these interventions will result into more years for the elderly on the earth.Advertising We will write a custom essay sample on The Neglect of t he Elderly specifically for you for only $16.05 $11/page Learn More References Helpguide.com. (n.d.). Elder abuse and neglect: warning signs, risk factors, prevention, and help. Web. McAlpine, C. H. (2008). Elder abuse and neglect. Oxford Journals, 37(2), 132-133. Web. Quinn, M. J., Tomita, S.K. (1997). Elder abuse and neglect: causes, diagnosis, and interventional strategies.  Springer Publishing Company. Web. This essay on The Neglect of the Elderly was written and submitted by user Pedro Green to help you with your own studies. You are free to use it for research and reference purposes in order to write your own paper; however, you must cite it accordingly. You can donate your paper here.

Hindenburg

Hindenburg Hydrogen Gas Disasters2H2 + O2  ¢Ã‚† 2H2Ohttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Space_Shuttle_Challenger_disaster mahal.org/articles/space/1995/12/the-space-shuttle-challenger-accident/page/1 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hindenburg_disasterWhen? At 11:38, on January 28 1986, 73 seconds into its flight.Where? Over the Atlantic Ocean, off the coast of central Florida.What? The space shuttle challenger broke apart and exploded when it was only 73 seconds into its flight.How? The tank of Hydrogen inside the External tank burst and leaked the liquid Hydrogen contents. With the sudden lack of Hydrogen, there was an extreme force that pushed the Hydrogen tank forward into the Oxygen tank, and that also burst. This caused the explosion.All seven members in the space shuttle were killed. Hydrogen was used in the shuttle because it is a very powerful propellant- perfect for rockets, space shuttles, etc.When? At 7:25 p.m. on May 6, 1937, while the Hindenburg was attempting to land because the wind co nditions were to strong for it.Camera E-207 show a plume near the aft strut that ...Where? At the Lakehurst Naval Air Station in New Jersey.What? A flame appeared on the outer cover of the end of the Hindenburg airship, and Within 34 seconds, the whole airship was engulfed by fire.How? Hugo Eckener thought that the fire was started by an electric spark caused by a build up of static electricity on the airship. The spark supposedly ignited hydrogen, which was leaking, on the outer skin of the airship.There were 36 deaths, that included passengers, crew, and ground crew, and 61 survivors.The airship was an aerostatic aircraft that stayed in the air by having a large "envelope" filled with a gas that was less dense than the surrounding atmosphere. The first lifting gas used was hydrogen, and this is why the Hindenburg contained it. Hydrogen gas is very flammable, so this leads many people onto thinking...

Death Penalty, Kantian Ethics, and Utilitarianism Essay

Death Penalty, Kantian Ethics, and Utilitarianism - Essay Example The argument that almost everyone would prefer life imprisonment than execution is often put forward by these people. But I do not agree at all with this argument as it does not hold any weightage in my point of view. My first argument against the claim of these activists is that they are talking solely about the preference of the criminals who commit capital crimes. They are not taking in the full picture here. The simple and straight forward truth of the matter is that most of these so called human right activists belong to either the neutral group or the group whose relatives or friends are facing such punishments. If you ask from the person who has lost a love one at the hands of these criminals, he would never advocate anything less than a death penalty for the guilty one. And it is their opinion that should hold more weightage, the one who has been wronged has the final say in deciding to punish the wrong doer, not the wrong doer himself. If the argument is that we should think humanely when dealing with these criminals, then my question is simple in this regard; is the killing of another person humane? If it is not, and I am sure you would agree that it is not, then the criminals who are gu ilty for murder have no right to ask for a humane punishment themselves. The supporters of utilitarianism will probably retaliate to this by asking of the specific usefulness of this particular act, i.e. putting a murderer to death. The utilitarian approach holds that all actions should be judged of their usefulness by looking at their consequences. The best action, according to this philosophy, is the one that maximizes the overall happiness. So, they hold the argument that life imprisonment isolates the bad people from the society forever, which should result in the satisfaction of all, the wronged and the wrong doers and the society in large. Then why opt for such a brutal punishment as the death penalty? But do we really know the consequences of any of our action? The repercussions and reverberations of a single action can span decades or even centuries. For me, the threat of an immediate punishment of death is the biggest deterrence humanity has against humans who have forgotte n humanity! The fear of this penalty might be stopping many people from taking someone’s life. Because humans instinctively fear all fears, and giving an exemplary punishment to someone instills that fears in the hearts of like-minded people (Rosen, 2003). I am advocating capital punishment only for the people who play any part in the wrongful killing of another human being. Countries that use death penalty for other crimes like drug related etc. should re-analyze their punishments in light of the contemporary deontology philosophy. This philosophy holds out that if harm to a few can save the majority, then it is justified for the greater good, if that harm is an aspect of the greater good itself. Therefore, if by executing someone like Osama bin Laden can remove the unease of a vast majority of the people, and can save lives, than it sure is justified. But drugs and adultery are acts that do not threaten to take someone’s life, so, the countries where death is given i n punishment to even these crimes; they should rethink the logic behind it and abolish it (Kamm, 2007). Now we come to the view of the ethical egoists. This philosophy and its adherents say that people ought to act in

Deviant Behaviors Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words

Deviant Behaviors - Research Paper Example Deviant behaviors involve the process by which conditions, actions, and or beliefs are viewed as deviant by others. Others, like copyright infringement, may not be considered as deviant. While acts of racism may attract negative reactions in some societies, it may not do so in other societies. Conditions, such as dwarfism, facial deformities or obesity, may cause individuals to be treated badly depending on the societal beliefs (Humphrey, 2006). Social assimilation is the connection to institutions and groups while social ruling is obedience to values and norms in a particular community. The ones highly incorporated fall under the group of selflessness while those who are not extremely incorporated are considered egoistic. Likewise, the regulated ones are considered in the category of fatalism and tolerable ones are in the category of anomie (Humphrey, 2006). Altruistic suicide (demise for the superior of the assembly), egocentric suicide (fall of the elimination of the acceptable connection with other people), anomic (fatality because of confusing of self-interest and norms of the society) are caused by limits (Flick, 2011). Robert K. Merton described deviant behavior by defining the objectives in his theory of anomie. He stated that anomie is defying of social norms. He also defines anomie as a condition where social goals and legitimacy are significant in communication. He explained that one’s reaction to the society were useful in considering deviance. Purposely, he studied combined action as provoked by frustration, strain, or stress in a body of people who arise from a detachment amid the goals of the society and the commonly used means to attain that goal. Usually, non-custom group deeds (rebellion, rioting etc.) are reflected on financial constrains. The two scopes dictate the revision to society depending on the cultural

Service Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words

Service - Essay Example The service learning traces its root to the mid-1980s. The mission of the program was to increase national service efforts among youth (Strom 1). As it is, the majority of colleges and universities have incorporated the program into their curriculums. In the United States, over one million students and 22,000 community organizations have taken part in the program (Strom 1). The mandatory service requirement may vary in different schools. It may entail building community support, allowing students to decide what to perform, training teachers, recognizing students initiatives as well as allowing students a chance to reflect on what they do (Loupe 1). These aspects are considered when it comes to enlisting the program into the curriculum. In some schools, the issue of mandatory service requirement has been adopted and received an acknowledgement from the students. However, in others, there is some form of resistance with no noticeable impact. As a result, this has led to a serious debat e on whether to adopt this program wholly or to shelf it for further consideration on its effects on students and schools. Therefore, the idea of having a mandatory service requirement of 30 hours needs further consideration in EFSC. The idea should not be implemented as it has failed in some schools; it is a way of forced work, substitute academic purpose, financial challenges, as well as criticism from leaders. First, it is clear that the policy of mandatory service requirements has been a failure in those schools that it has already been started. In Jefferson Parish School, the program has been implemented with dismal outcomes. In the school, the administrators viewed the program as a way of detracting students from academic achievements (Loupe 1). The detraction can occur as the students may be required to earn hours of service during class time. The effect is that a considerable amount of time will be lost that could be used for other academic activities such as

The Shareholder And Stakeholder Theory Management Essay

The Shareholder And Stakeholder Theory Management Essay Governance helps us do the right thing, the right way for our shareholders and our customers, employees, suppliers, local communities and the environment. Our governance is focused on how to get it right, not only in the board room but also across the businessà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‚ ¦ (Page 46) Statement 2 Our aim is to build a sustainable business through consistent, profitable growth and to make sure that our customers and wider stakeholders can always trust us to do the right thing. We aximizat that creating shareholder value is the reward for taking acceptable risks. (page 54) Required From a finance perspective the main objective of a firm is to aximiza shareholder wealth. However from the two statements above it appears that in reality companies dont just focus on shareholders. To what extent do you agree that shareholder wealth aximization should be a superior objective over stakeholder interest? Discuss your answer with relevant supporting literature. You may also back up your discussion with relevant real life examples from any where in the world. (40 marks) Answer: The issue whether managers should apply shareholder theory or stakeholder theory is opens for debate. Some theorists believe that maximize shareholder profit is the highest objective of firm. However, there are many articles and academic journals assert that stakeholder theory is the modern management methods. Personally, each position has its own reasons. In the following assignment, I would like to analyze these options and present my view about two theories. Before we argue about two theories, it is helpful to get some definitions of shareholder, stakeholder and to consider what theories say about. The Businessdictionary.com defines shareholder as Individual, group, or organization that holds one or more shares in a firm, and in whose name the share certificate is issued. It is legal for a firm to have only one shareholder. Also it called stockholder. Also follow this website, stakeholder is a person, group, or organization that has direct or indirect stake in an organization because it can affect or be affected by the organizations actions, objectives, and policies. Key stakeholders in a business organization include creditors, customers, directors, employees, government (and its agencies), owners (shareholders), suppliers, unions, and the community from which the business draws its resources. Mentioned about the Shareholder Theory, Milton Friedman who got the Nobel winning economist asserts that managers should only focus to maximize the firms shareholders value. He stated, There is one and only one social responsibility of business to use its resources and engage in activities designed to increase its profits so long as it à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‚ ¦ engages in open and free competition, without deception or fraud(Friedman, 1962). Nearly, according to H. Jeff Smith (2003), shareholder theory indicates that shareholder advances capital to a companys managers, who are supposed to spend corporate funds only in ways that have been authorized by the shareholders. According to the Stakeholder Theory, the focus of theory is connecting in two core questions (Freeman, 1994). First, it mentioned about the purpose of the firm, the vital purpose of the company is to serve and coordinate the interests of not only shareholders but also its various stakeholders. Second, stakeholder theory asks, what responsibility does management have to stakeholder? The managers are represented of all stakeholders and have two responsibilities: to protect the ethical rights of stakeholders and to consider the legitimate interests of the stakeholders as they make decisions. They have to balance between the maximization of profit and the long-term ability of the corporation growth. The fundamental difference is that the stakeholder theory requires that the stakeholders interests be balanced even it reduces firm profitability. There are always many arguments around two theories about social responsibility, and one of the most important causes is that both of theories are misunderstood in several ways. From the shareholder theory, some people hold the opinion that managers try to do anything you can to make a profit, even though the shareholder theory compels managers to increase profit only through legal, non-decretive means (Friedman, Capitalism and Freedom). Also, the shareholder theory is criticized because of gearing toward to maximize the short-term profit at the expense of the long operate. However, the shareholder theorists often refer to the corporations management look at the shareholders interest to take a long-term orientation. Besides that, they also claimed that the shareholder theory prevent using corporate funds to donate some project or invest in improved employee environment. In fact, the shareholder theory supports the employee efforts such as those initiatives because it increases indire ctly the shareholders wealth. Similarly, the first misunderstanding of stakeholder theory is that it is claimed the theory does not demand that a firm focus on profitability. However, the highest objective of stakeholder theory is balancing the interests of all stakeholders, including shareholders, whose interests are usually addressed by profit. Second, there are many stakeholder theory description provide no formula for examine the stakeholders interests; some of the theories provide no guidance in this regard. Agree with stakeholder theory, in 2003, Waxenberger and Spence illustrated that stakeholder theory has become an important tool help to translate the business ethics to management practice and strategy. Similarly, there is an increasing interrelation between the corporate responsibility and business ethics (Valor, 2005; Garriga and Melà ©, 2004). The stakeholder theory has become the grille de lecture as analyzing the companys responsibility (Attarca Jacquot, 2005). In 1976, Michael Jensen and William Meckling explored the principal-agent definition, disputing that managers often fail to maximize profits if shareholders did not invest their time and money to create appropriate encouragement. By contrast, Colin Grant indicates that managers should concentrate obsessively on profitability, and that the ethics should be marginalized (1991). In 2003, McAleer also assert that firms responsibility is only to maximize for shareholders wealth. Silver (2005) seek and offer the promotion and protection of autonomy like an improvement in Friedman framework because Silver said that a manager with his moral obligations would be a bureaucratic machine that automatically decides to make as much money as it can without lying or breaking the law. Sundaram and Inkpen on The corporate objective Revisited (2004) said Governing the corporation requires purposeful activity. All purposeful activity, in turn, requires goals and in the modern company, maximizing shareholders value is the only appropriate goal for managers. The stakeholder theorists have strong interpretations when they mention about shareholders responsibility in some scandals at Enron, ImClone, Global Crossing, Tyco International and WorldCom. It concerns about the business ethics between the independence of accountants who take responsibility for auditing financial statements, and the investor recommendation at Credit Suisse First Boston and Merrill Lynch. Besides the social responsibility, they often argue about the maximizing shareholder profit that is not the long term purpose of corporation. For instant, the fall horse of Stan ONeal, the ex-CEO of Merrill Lynch, often mentions like an expensive lesson in business management. His autocratic management had brought the impressive profits to Merrill Lynch from 2003 to 2007. He optimized profit through minimize the cost by dismissing the employees and closing many inefficient branches. His altitude and autocratic management make the dissatisfaction of employees and cause for the later failure. These scandals not only reveal serious weakness of shareholder theory but also stakeholder theory about the social responsibilities of business because of lacking prohibitions against fraud and deception. According to Thomas L. Carson (2003), there are four important points. Firstly, recent scandals highlight the stakeholder theory is very naÃÆ' ¯ve and unrealistic hopes and expectations for managers. Secondly, recent events do not constitute an objection to the shareholder theory about the firms social responsibilities. Nevertheless, these scandals make evident the implausibility of strong versions of the invisible hand theory. Next, schemes of payment and reward often create perverse incentives for individual to engage in unethical conduct. Finally, both two theories need to add a constraint that prohibits managers from pressuring, enticing, or permitting professionals. In my opinion, I agree with shareholder theory. Firstly, there are some misunderstood that I interpretation above, the managers do not do everything to maximize profit. Comeback to some main business objectives that are achieving a target market share, keeping employee agitation to a minimum, survival, creating an ever-expanding empire, maximization of profit and maximization of long-term shareholder wealth (Glend Arnord, Corporate financial management, fourth edition). Connecting with shareholder theory, the highest objective of firm should not understand maximization of profit, we need to approach with the widen definition the maximization of the shareholder wealth. This definition reflects three key variables directly affect shareholders wealth: timing of cash flows, magnitude of cash flows and the risk of the cash flows that investors expect a firm to generate overtime. Secondly, the shareholder who gives capital or equity for invests or remains the development of corporation. They also obtain many operating risks and financial risks, and if the company is bankrupted, shareholder would be the last person get the return. Therefore, the main firms objective must be maximization of shareholders value in order to compensate for their risks. The next reason is optimization the stockholders value is the same meaning that the corporation has to optimize the productive process, supply chain, delivery and personnel. These actions help corporate structure become effectively and orderly. It differ from do anything you can to make a profit, and in some situations, managers should balance the shareholder wealth maximization with stakeholder interest. A firm cannot maximize value, Jensen (2000) writes, if it ignores the interests of its stakeholders. According to Michael Poster father of competitive theory, the fundamental firms objective is getting the higher ROIC Return On Invested Capital; rest of all is the secondary objective. In conclusion, shareholder wealth maximization is a superior objective over stake holder interests. However, in order to keeping the long-term stable growth, the managers not only focus to maximize the shareholders value, but also balance with stakeholders interests.

Baldwins Effects of Narration and Analysis in Notes of a Native Son Es

Baldwin’s Effects of Narration and Analysis in â€Å"Notes of a Native Son† Personal stories and descriptions of major events are narrated throughout James Baldwin’s works as he analyzes the nature of the relationship between white and black America. The marriage of narration and analysis are especially evident in Baldwin’s essay, â€Å"Notes of a Native Son.† As Baldwin describes his father and their relationship until his father’s death, he simultaneously comments about the relationship between white and black America. Baldwin compares the events of his experience with concurrent American events to conclude about the nature of his personal relationships and the relationship between races; namely, that one must come to accept the reality of mankind, yet must strive to fight the injustice inherent in mankind’s nature. Baldwin begins with a brief description of the 1943 Detroit and Harlem riots and his father’s funeral. Both riots were centered on resistance to injustice, while the death of Baldwin’s father marked the end of oppression in Baldwin’s life as seen later in the work. These two events juxtaposed in the opening paragraph propose the questions that Baldwin works to answer by the end of his essay. Baldwin concludes his opening paragraph with â€Å"we drove my father to the graveyard through a wilderness of smashed plate glass† (63). The first question is â€Å"why death?† while the second question is â€Å"why resist?† Baldwin’s father is never named in the work but is always referred to as â€Å"my father.† This ambiguity allows Baldwin’s father to play dual roles throughout the work as both the oppressor and as the oppressed, symbolizing both white and black America. Almost immediately, Baldwin points out ... ... one must acknowledge mankind for what it is and the associated injustice without reserve; however, one must also resist the injustice inherent in mankind. This applies to the struggle between races as well as it applied to Baldwin’s relationship with his father. The initial questions proposed by â€Å"Notes† are answered in a general warning: hate breeds death and destruction, so resist the injustice where hate is conceived while accepting the unjust for who they are. It is through both personal and general experiences that Baldwin arrives at his final conclusion, offering a warning to society and the individuals within: hate only causes destruction and must be put aside before positive gains may be achieved. Works Cited Baldwin, James. â€Å"Notes of a Native Son.† 1955. James Baldwin: Collected Essays. Ed. Toni Morrison. New York: Library of America, 1998. 63-84.